Communications Workers v. School Bd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, because the union’s complaint was arguably covered by chapter 447, absent deferral by PERC, it was subject to PERC’s exclusive jurisdiction
• holding that labor union cannot bypass PERC’s jurisdiction where failure to follow collective bargaining process is alleged and school board unilaterally modified health insurance plan due to perceived “financial urgency”
• “[Arbitration proceedings cannot be set aside for mere errors of judgment either as to the law or as to the facts .... ” (emphasis added) (quoting Noriega, 542 So.2d at 1328)
• \[T]he fact that the relief was such that it could not or would not be granted by a court of law or equity is not ground for vacating or refusing to confirm the award.\ (quoting Fla. Stat. § 682.13 )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).