Schnurmacher Holding, Inc. v. Noriega

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the arbitrator did not exceed his power because he decided only the issues submitted to arbitration
• stating that the grounds for judicial review of an arbitration award are extremely limited by statute and do not include error of law
• noting that to \allow judicial review of the merits of an arbitration award for any reasons other than those” specifically enumerated in the Arbitration Code undermines the \integrity of the arbitration process as a means of alternative dispute resolution.”
• “Section 682.13(1) sets forth the only grounds upon which an award of an arbitrator ... may be vacated .... ”
• arbitrator's erroneous construction of statute was no basis to vacate award because error of law was not specific ground for vacating award
• arbitration award operates as final and conclusive judgment; judicial review is limited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).