Cason v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the suppression hearing judge did not abuse his discretion in having the State reopen its case to receive tangible evidence that had been referenced during trial
• determining that the suppression hearing judge did not abuse his discretion in having the State reopen its case to receive tangible evidence that had been referenced during trial
• appellate court function is to “review decisions, rulings, and actions of the [trial] court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wisneski v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-07-12· cited 11×
• Stewart v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-26· cited 10×
• Walls v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-27· cited 6×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-11-25
• State v. Payton
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2018-11-01