Hardwick Brothers Company II v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Court of Federal Claims retained jurisdiction despite later-filed action involving same claim as defined for purposes of section 1500
• holding that Tecon survived UNR because of Keene
• explaining that Tecon’s order-of-filing rule “remains good law and binding on this court”
• stating that Tecon “remains good law and binding on this court”
• remanding case because later-filed District Court action does not divest Court of Federal Claims of jurisdiction that was earlier properly established
• “[T]he Supreme Court expressly declined to overturn Tecon Engineers, and this court in Loveladies I acknowledged the continuing vitality of Tecon as an established precedent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).