Skip to main content
· 1/28/1999

Casiano v. Apfel

Citations

  • 39 F. Supp. 2d 326
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 842
  • 1999 WL 41654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Pro se plaintiff’s] allegations are overly broad and conclusory, and without more, are not sufficient to defeat the Commissioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stein, Peck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.