Anthony J. Dousewicz v. Patricia R. Harris, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that retrospective diagnoses must be “considered in light of the entire record”
• “While [the treating physician] did not treat the appellant during the relevant period before September 30, 1971, his opinion is still entitled to significant weight.”
• “While [the physician] did not treat the appellant during the relevant period ..., his opinion is still entitled to significant weight.”
• “While [the current treating physician] did not treat the appellant during the relevant period before [the date last insured], his opinion is still entitled to significant weight.”
• diagnosis proper though made several years after actual onset of impairment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).