· 3/29/2010
Dickert v. Dickert
Citations
- 691 S.E.2d 448
- 387 S.C. 1
- 2010 S.C. LEXIS 82
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the family court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees when it properly considered the E.D.M. and Glasscock factors
- rejecting a claim that the goodwill in the dental practice was enterprise goodwill and thus finding the goodwill was properly excluded from the marital estate
- providing the decision whether to award attorney's fees is a matter within the sound discretion of the family court
- rejecting a claim that the goodwill in the dental practice was enterprise goodwill and, thus, finding the goodwill was properly excluded from the marital estate
- providing this court may defer to the findings of the family court because the family court sits in a better position to evaluate credibility of witnesses and weigh their testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Waller, Pleicones, Beatty, Kittredge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.