Skip to main content
· 3/29/2010

Dickert v. Dickert

Citations

  • 691 S.E.2d 448
  • 387 S.C. 1
  • 2010 S.C. LEXIS 82

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the family court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees when it properly considered the E.D.M. and Glasscock factors
  • rejecting a claim that the goodwill in the dental practice was enterprise goodwill and thus finding the goodwill was properly excluded from the marital estate
  • providing the decision whether to award attorney's fees is a matter within the sound discretion of the family court
  • rejecting a claim that the goodwill in the dental practice was enterprise goodwill and, thus, finding the goodwill was properly excluded from the marital estate
  • providing this court may defer to the findings of the family court because the family court sits in a better position to evaluate credibility of witnesses and weigh their testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Waller, Pleicones, Beatty, Kittredge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.