Skip to main content

Case v. State

Citations

  • 709 P.2d 670
  • 103 N.M. 501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that we review the district court’s exercise of its criminal 8 contempt power for an abuse of discretion
  • “It is the responsibility of the judiciary to exercise that power wisely and always within its limitations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riordan, Federici, Sosa, Walters, Stowers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.