Casco v. Armour Swift-Eckrich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting workers compensation statutes to abrogate parallel injury rule relied upon by trial courts for 76 years
• abrogating judicially created parallel injury rule notwithstanding legislative inaction for 76 years
• overruling 76-year-old parallel injury rule as being contrary to workers compensation statutes
• overruling prior Supreme Court precedent on parallel injury rule in workers compensation
• overruling over 70-year-old caselaw that was contrary to plain statutory language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).