Skip to main content
· 4/1/2011

Hill v. Kansas Dept. of Labor

Citations

  • 248 P.3d 1287
  • 292 Kan. 17

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the word “may” in K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 44-532[d] affords the administrative law judge the discretion to impose or not impose a civil penalty
  • noting that the doctrine of operative construction has lost favor
  • noting that the doctrine of operative construction has lost favor
  • distinguishing \directory language such as 'shall' or 'must' \ from \the permissive word 'may' \
  • contrasting \permissive word 'may' \ with \directory language such as 'shall' or 'must' \
  • contrasting \permissive word 'may'\ with \directory language such as 'shall' or 'must'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosen, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.