Skip to main content
· 4/10/1992

Stephenson v. Sugar Creek Packing & Hartford Insurance

Citations

  • 830 P.2d 41
  • 250 Kan. 768
  • 1992 Kan. LEXIS 80

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Honn rule to repetitive injuries to both upper extremities and holding statutory provision cutting back on Honn in such cases to be unconstitutional
  • applying the Honn rule to repetitive injuries to both upper extremities and finding the statutory provision cutting back on Honn in such cases to be unconstitutional
  • provisions of Workers Compensation Act challenged on- equal protection grounds and rational basis test applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allegrucci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.