Skip to main content

Caruthers v. State

Citations

  • 926 N.E.2d 1016
  • 2010 Ind. LEXIS 342
  • 2010 WL 1946278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \courts have a duty to ensure an impartial jury\
  • arguing one’s own ineffectiveness is not permissible under the Rules of Professional Conduct
  • “we cannot infer prejudice where none is shown and no relationship between a juror and a party existed”
  • “we cannot infer prejudice where none is shown and no relationship between a juror and a party existed”
  • no fundamental error where trial court did not interrogate jury for bias after taking additional security measures to address unspecified juror concerns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.