Tancil v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for a new trial because there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict
• addressing both motion to correct error and motion for a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).