Cramer v. Chiles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that when state phased out funding for private intermediate care facilities for the developmentally disabled (“ICF/DDs”), thus requiring recipients of that Medicaid service to choose between public ICF/DD and HCBC waiver services, § 1396a(a)(3
• finding predicate act of obstruction of justice adequately alleged when plaintiff claimed defendant gave false deposition testimony and false affidavit in ongoing federal litigation
• “Underfunding of the Home and Community-Based Waiver program compels institutionalization, thus negating a meaningful choice.”
• finding no individual right in § 1396n(c)(2)(C) that could be enforced under § 1983, but conducting an even briefer analysis of the issue than those district court decisions coming to the opposite conclusion
• “Underfunding of the Home and Community-Based Waiver program compels institutionalization, thus negating meaningful choice.”
• upholding constitutional and statutory rights of disabled persons to home and community-based treatment in a decision that caused the State of Florida to substantially increase its funding of these programs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).