Carter v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Notwithstanding the fact that he will be reevaluated for the possibility of parole in 2022, we conclude the defendant is correct and that he is entitled to resentencing under sections 775.082(3)(c) and 921.1401.”
• “Notwithstanding the fact that he will be reevaluated for the possibility of parole in 2022, we conclude the defendant is correct and that he is entitled to resentencing under sections 775.082(3)(c) and 921.1401.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Yero v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-29· cited 1×
• State v. Calix
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-25· cited 1×
• Reid v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-31
• State v. Ratliff
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-03
• State of Florida v. Budry Michel
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2018-11-01
• State v. EFREN YERO
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-01-13

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State of Florida v. Anthony Duwayne Horsley, Jr.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2015-03-19· cited 174×
• Henry v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2015-03-19· cited 141×
• Angelo Atwell v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-05-26· cited 103×
• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-01-25· cited 9×
• Carter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-02-09· cited 6×