Miller v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The State's contention that Miller was parole-eligible as early as twelve years after the commission of first-degree murder is irrelevant.\
• “The State’s contention that Miller was parole-eligible as early as twelve years after the commission of first-degree murder is irrelevant.”
• “The State’s contention that Miller was parole-eligible as early as twelve years after the commission of first-degree murder is irrelevant.”
• “The State’s contention that [the defendant] was parole-eligible as early as twelve years after the commission of first-degree murder is irrelevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-15· cited 7×
• Wilkinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-01· cited 1×
• Yero v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-29· cited 1×
• Reid v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-31
• Pizarro Ortiz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-07-19
• Russ v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-18
• State of Florida v. Budry Michel
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2018-11-01

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Neely v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-30· cited 2×