Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 8/31/2001
Carter v. State
Citations
- 843 So. 2d 807
- 2001 WL 996294
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing claim challenging allegedly inconsistent verdicts when raised in a motion for a new trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cobb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 2002-05-17· cited 20×
- Cockrell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 2004-05-07· cited 10×
- Heard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-03-18· cited 4×
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2007-03-02· cited 4×
- Hammonds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2006-04-28· cited 2×
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2002-08-30· cited 1×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. AlmoIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-09-27· cited 100×
- People v. HofferIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-03-29· cited 99×
- People v. SpearsIllinois Supreme Court· 1986-05-21· cited 83×
- People v. KlingenbergIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-04-18· cited 58×
- Harvey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-08-30· cited 47×
- People v. BeckerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-08-07· cited 27×
- Grikis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-09-29· cited 19×
- Mathis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-09-09· cited 9×
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 2001-05-25· cited 6×
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2000-06-30· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.