Skip to main content

People v. Spears

Citations

  • 493 N.E.2d 1030
  • 112 Ill. 2d 396
  • 98 Ill. Dec. 9
  • 1986 Ill. LEXIS 262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that \it does not follow ... that one who acts recklessly also acts knowingly\
  • refusing to “metaphysically divine a jury’s collective intent from a single question that may well have only embodied the curiosity or concern of a single juror”
  • all holding that a trial court has a duty to refuse inconsistent guilty verdicts and to instruct the jury to resolve the inconsistency
  • all holding that a trial court has a duty to refuse inconsistent guilty verdicts and to instruct the jury to resolve the inconsistency
  • the defendant asserted theory that shootings were unintentional, so he tendered jury instructions on reckless conduct as a lesser-included offense of armed violence
  • the defendant asserted theory that shootings were unintentional, so he tendered jury instructions on reckless conduct as a lesser-included offense of armed violence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.