Carter v. CITIGROUP INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiffs did not establish the due diligence required to utilize fraudulent concealment to save their time-barred claims where they received copies of loan documents but did not read them and were not prevented from reading them
• applying this section for breach of fiduciary duty and conspiracy claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).