Andrus v. Ellis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that once informed she had no health insurance, diligence required that plaintiff either “object or inquire as to why her understanding of the insurance contract fundamentally differs from Commercial Credit’s understanding”
• “‘[i]n Mississippi, a person is charged with knowing the contents of any document that he executes’”; “‘[a] person cannot avoid a written contract which he has entered into on the ground that he did not read it or have it read to him’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).