Cherry v. Anthony, Gibbs, Sage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even if [the insureds] had not [read the subject insurance policy], knowledge of its contents would be imputed to them as a matter of law.”
• “Even if [the insureds] had not [read the subject insurance policy], knowledge of its contents would be imputed to them as a matter of law.”
• in the context of an insurance policy, knowledge of contract terms is “imputed to [the contracting party] as a matter of law”
• when construing provisions of a contract, the court must look to the document as a whole
• parties must be substantially identical for res judicata to apply
• there is a substantial legal difference between a insurance agency and the individual who shares its name such that res judicata does not apply to bar the action because the parties are not substantially identical

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).