New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2/3/1999
Carter v. Carter
Citations
- 722 A.2d 977
- 318 N.J. Super. 34
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when awarding rehabilitative alimony, even in cases that are settled, the court must make specific findings about these statutory factors
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Pressler, Brochin, and Kleiner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lepis v. LepisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-06-11· cited 573×
- Curtis v. FinneranSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-07-22· cited 315×
- Heinl v. HeinlNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-02-14· cited 87×
- Hughes v. HughesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-04-29· cited 24×
- Ribner v. RibnerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-05-02· cited 19×
- Walles v. WallesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-12-04· cited 17×
- Shifman v. ShifmanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-06-16· cited 11×
- Cerminara v. CerminaraNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-01-17· cited 9×
- Rolnick v. RolnickNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-04-25· cited 9×
- Kulakowski v. KulakowskiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1982-09-15· cited 8×
- Milner v. MilnerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-03-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.