Heinl v. Heinl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \an oral pronouncement of a judgment in open court on the record constitutes the jural act\
• holding the Family Part has \a duty to make findings of fact and to state [its] reasons in support of [its] conclusions.\
• noting judicial error in failing to fully articulate why a relatively short marital life required an award of permanent alimony rather than rehabilitative alimony
• requiring specified, articulate findings of fact and conclusions of law in court's decision, not naked conclusions
• reasoning the trial court is \under a duty to make findings of fact and to state reasons in support of their conclusions\
• \The absence of adequate findings . . . necessitates a reversal . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).