Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of New Jersey· 7/22/1980

Curtis v. Finneran

Citations

  • 417 A.2d 15
  • 83 N.J. 563
  • 1980 N.J. LEXIS 1373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court must state clearly its factual findings and correlate them with the relevant legal conclusions
  • recognizing \the trial court must state clearly its factual findings and correlate them with the relevant legal conclusions\ as required by Rule 1:7-4
  • recognizing \the trial court must state clearly its factual findings and correlate them with the relevant legal conclusions\ as required by Rule 1:7-4
  • stating in context of nonjury civil action, “the trial court must state clearly its factual findings and correlate them with the relevant legal conclusions”
  • requiring trial court to clearly state its factual findings and correlate them with the relevant legal conclusions
  • noting a court \does not discharge [its] function simply by recounting the parties' conflicting assertions and then stating a legal conclusion\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pollock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Curtis v. Finneran

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.