W.D. New York· 8/8/1995
Carter v. Carriero
Citations
- 905 F. Supp. 99
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12934
- 1995 WL 522806
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- given similarities between disciplinary segregation and administrative segregation, disciplinary segregation does not impose atypical and significant hardship
- 180 days’ disciplinary confinement in SHU does not implicate a liberty interest
- 89 days in keeplock does not implicate a liberty interest
- 270 days in SHU not considered an atypical or significant hardship
- 360 days sentenced, 270 days served in SHU
- 210 days in SHU confinement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Skretny
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cusamano v. SobekN.D. New York· 2009-01-26· cited 141×
- Delaney v. SelskyN.D. New York· 1995-10-02· cited 93×
- Cespedes v. CoughlinS.D. New York· 1997-02-07· cited 70×
- Quartararo v. CattersonE.D. New York· 1996-01-25· cited 30×
- Roucchio v. CoughlinE.D. New York· 1996-04-15· cited 23×
- Justice v. CoughlinN.D. New York· 1996-10-15· cited 19×
- Harris v. KeaneS.D. New York· 1997-04-21· cited 17×
- Beckford v. PortuondoN.D. New York· 2001-06-29· cited 17×
- Neratko v. FrankW.D. New York· 1998-11-19· cited 17×
- Stone-Bey v. BarnesN.D. Indiana· 1996-01-29· cited 12×
- Bonner v. ParkeN.D. Indiana· 1996-02-27· cited 11×
- Porter v. CoughlinW.D. New York· 1997-05-07· cited 10×
- Marino v. KlagesN.D. New York· 1997-03-27· cited 8×
- Wilson v. HarperS.D. Iowa· 1996-11-14· cited 6×
- Wright v. CoughlinW.D. New York· 1998-12-17· cited 6×
- Husbands v. McClellanW.D. New York· 1997-03-26· cited 4×
- Walker v. MahoneyE.D. New York· 1996-02-09· cited 4×
- Brewton v. HollisterW.D. New York· 1996-11-13· cited 3×
- Jones v. KellyW.D. New York· 1996-08-26· cited 3×
- Sandefur v. LewisD. Arizona· 1996-08-14· cited 2×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 15,427×
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 9,097×
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court· 1980-11-10· cited 3,527×
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 2,461×
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanSecond Circuit· 1991-01-17· cited 1,081×
- Joseph E. Dister v. The Continental Group, Inc.Second Circuit· 1988-10-03· cited 764×
- James Williams v. Harold J. Smith, Superintendent, and W. Morgan, C.O., Attica Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 1986-01-15· cited 571×
- Capital Imaging Associates, P.C. v. Mohawk Valley Medical Associates, Inc., Mohawk Valley Physicians Plan, Inc.Second Circuit· 1993-06-10· cited 288×
- Jerry Young Also Known as Ramadan, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Richard Hoffman, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantSecond Circuit· 1992-07-31· cited 52×
- Lott v. SelskyS.D. New York· 1990-09-19· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.