Quartararo v. Catterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the February 12, 1992 letter to plaintiff from defendant Lester, a letter plaintiff claims never to have received, was constitutionally insufficient
• rejecting defendants’ argument that this case amounts to nothing more than an “unfortunate set of timing” and setting forth the rapid pace of the events of February 11 and 12, 1992

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).