Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 10/8/1996
Carter v. Anderson
Citations
- 554 N.W.2d 110
- 1996 Minn. App. LEXIS 1155
- 1996 WL 571341
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “Rule 60.02 is limited to the specific situations provided for in the rule itself and does not allow for general correction of judicial error”
- explaining that Rule 60.02 provides relief from judgments under “very specific” and “narrowly defined” circumstances
- applying Finden factors on review of district court’s vacation of summary judgment
- “Rule 60.02 is limited to the specific situations provided for in the rule itself and does not allow for general correction of judicial error.”
- “[I]t is doubtful that [r]ule 60.02 can be used as a substitute for appeal based on a perceived judicial error.”
- “[B]ecause the district court did not make any Rule 60.02 analysis or apply the Finden test, we must do so.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crippen, Parker, Short
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Raymond Kvalvog v. Park Christian School, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2023-05-04· cited 19×
- Marriage of Brazinsky v. BrazinskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-05-30· cited 15×
- Sullivan v. Spot Weld, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-03-05· cited 14×
- Koes v. Advanced Design, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-12-04· cited 11×
- Reid v. StrodtmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-07-17· cited 11×
- Lewis v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-12-08· cited 5×
- North Star International Trucks, Inc. v. Navistar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-08-26· cited 1×
- Buck Blacktop, Inc. v. Gary Contracting and Trucking Company, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2019-05-06· cited 1×
- Ashley Anderson v. Adam Aaron AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2026-04-27
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry Wayne Sanders v. Clemco Industries and Ingersoll-Rand CompanyEighth Circuit· 1988-11-30· cited 330×
- Finden v. KlaasSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1964-05-22· cited 90×
- Charson v. Temple IsraelSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-02-19· cited 42×
- Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-03-26· cited 36×
- In Re State & Regents Building Asbestos CasesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-01-31· cited 24×
- Boulevard Del, Inc. v. StillmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-01-25· cited 22×
- Arzt v. ArztCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-01-22· cited 20×
- Wilkie v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-12-30· cited 10×
- Welch v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-04-09· cited 9×
- Nordeen v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-02-25· cited 3×
- Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-03-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.