Skip to main content
· 11/30/1988

Terry Wayne Sanders v. Clemco Industries and Ingersoll-Rand Company

Citations

  • 862 F.2d 161
  • 12 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 750
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16091
  • 1988 WL 125932

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “district court was not required to grant relief under Rule 60(b) as a substitute for ... exercising [the] right to appeal the alleged error”
  • seeking reconsideration under Rule 60(b) of order denying creditor’s claim for failure of creditor to appear
  • warning about “the dangers of filing a self-styled ‘motion for reconsideration’ that is not described by any particular rule of federal civil procedure.”
  • discussing differences in characterizing unlabeled motion for reconsideration as either under Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b)
  • discussing differences in characterizing unlabeled motion for reconsideration as either under Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b)
  • discussing differences in characterizing unlabeled motion for reconsideration as either under Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Bright, Fagg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.