Arzt v. Arzt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Rule 60.02 is intended to correct mistake or inadvertence of a party, or to allow for newly discovered evidence not to correct for judicial error.” (emphasis added)
• “Rule 60.02 is intended to correct mistake or inadvertence of a party, or to allow for newly discovered evidence . . . not to correct for judicial error.”
• “Rule 60.02 is intended to correct mistake or inadvertence of a party, or to allow for newly discovered evidence, or for void or satisfied judgments, not to correct judicial error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).