Skip to main content
· 2/17/1998

Carstens v. Mayers, Inc.

Citations

  • 574 N.W.2d 733
  • 1998 Minn. App. LEXIS 181
  • 1998 WL 61130

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that assistance given as a “favor or an accommodation” does not amount to interdependence of employees’ activities
  • holding that assistance given as a “favor or an accommodation” does not mean that the employees are engaged in a common activity
  • holding that a “favor or an accommodation” between two groups of employees does not affect the common-activity analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crippen, Schumacher, Holtan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.