Skip to main content
· 2/3/1987

Higgins v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Citations

  • 400 N.W.2d 192
  • 1987 Minn. App. LEXIS 4024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding two employers engaged on same project when they had longstanding, continuous, and close commercial relationship installing, maintaining, and modifying one of the two employer’s telephone switching equipment
  • Northwestern Bell and Western Electric were engaged on the same project where both companies installed, maintained and modified the same equipment over a longstanding, close commercial relationship
  • common enterprise found to exist between employees who “worked in close proximity to each other performing generally the same tasks while working on the same equipment in the same physical areas” Id. at 198-94

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.