Schleicher v. Lunda Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that two sets of employees were not engaged in a common activity even though “the goals of [the employees] were related”
• concrete truck drivers and conveyor system operators, while advancing same goal, are exposed to different hazards and engage in different activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-06-06· cited 96×
• Shore v. Minneapolis Auto Auction, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-08-18· cited 7×
• Olson v. Lyrek
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-08-11· cited 7×
• Brandt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-08-16· cited 7×
• LeDoux v. M.A. Mortenson Co.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-07-22· cited 7×
• Carstens v. Mayers, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-02-17· cited 5×
• Kelly ex rel. Washburn v. Kraemer Construction, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-06-07· cited 5×
• O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-06-14· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-08-03· cited 102×
• Abdallah, Inc. v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1954-06-25· cited 94×
• McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1958-11-21· cited 65×
• Volding v. Harnish
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1952-02-15· cited 14×
• Urbanski v. Merchants Motor Freight, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1953-03-27· cited 13×
• Schleicher v. Lunda Construction Co.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-04-01· cited 4×

Other cases named Schleicher v. Lunda Construction Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Schleicher v. Lunda Construction Co.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-04-01· cited 4×