Skip to main content

Carson City v. Price

Citations

  • 934 P.2d 1042
  • 113 Nev. 409

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a claim for injunctive relief was barred under the doctrine of laches where the delaying party \did not promptly pursue legal action\
  • recognizing that the laches doctrine is an equitable doctrine that is invoked to deny relief to a party who worked to the disadvantage of the other and caused a change in circumstances
  • recognizing that the laches doctrine is an equitable doctrine that is invoked to deny relief to a party who worked to the disadvantage of the other and caused a change in circumstances
  • noting that the court may apply laches when the condition of the party asserting laches has become so changed that it cannot be restored to its prior state
  • denying respondents' motion to dismiss based on appellants' one-day tardiness in filing their opening brief because \respondents have not alleged or shown that they suffered any prejudice as a result of this delay\
  • denying respondents’ motion to dismiss based on appellants’ one-day tardiness in filing their opening brief because “respondents have not alleged or shown that they suffered any prejudice as a result of this delay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shearing, Springer, Rose, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.