Skip to main content
· 10/3/1968

Carsek Corp. v. Stephen Schifter, Inc.

Citations

  • 431 Pa. 550
  • 246 A.2d 365
  • 1968 Pa. LEXIS 649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging the merger doctrine does not apply where the expressed intention of the parties is to the contrary
  • acknowledging the merger doctrine does not apply where the expressed intention of the parties is to the contrary
  • providing example such as certain clauses in contracts dealing with consideration
  • providing example such as certain clauses in contracts dealing with consideration
  • rule of merger avoided where parties’ expressed intentions are to the contrary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.