Skip to main content
· 4/5/1971

Guy v. Hanley

Citations

  • 111 N.H. 73
  • 276 A.2d 1
  • 1971 N.H. LEXIS 126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • whether time essential to be determined by reference to instrument and all surrounding circumstances
  • “The general rule is that unless specifically so stated, time is not to be considered as of the essence” and “[t]he mere fact that a date is stated in the instrument is not sufficient alone to alter this rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.