Lehman v. Paxton
Citations
- 7 Pa. Super. 259
- 1898 Pa. Super. LEXIS 280
Syllabus
<p>Contract — Covenants in agreement — When not merged in deed.</p> <p>The rule, that the acceptance of a deed in pursuance of a contract of sale is presumably in satisfaction of all previous covenants, is not without exceptions. A contract remains binding as to further stipulations, contained in it, conferring valuable rights on the vendee and forming part of the consideration on which he contracted to pay the purchase money and accept the deed. An agreement to convey clear of all incumbrances not embodied in terms in the deed is an obligation subsisting and enforceable.</p>
Judges: Beaver, Orladt, Porter, Reeder, Rice, Smith, Wickham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Carsek Corp. v. Stephen Schifter, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-10-03· cited 39×
- Dobkin v. LandsbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1922-03-06· cited 33×
- Stewart v. TrimbleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1901-01-22· cited 12×
- Bodine v. Wayne Title & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1907-02-25· cited 6×
- Wilson v. PearlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1899-12-11· cited 5×
- Gangloff v. SmaltzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1901-12-02· cited 3×
- White v. MurrayW.D. Pennsylvania· 1914-12-29· cited 3×
- Wazonek v. SaulBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 1922-12-23
- Remmett v. SmithLackawanna County Court of Common Pleas· 1947-05-02
- Smith v. BradleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1914-05-19
- Greencastle Livestock Market, Inc. v. KnauffFranklin County Court of Common Pleas· 1951-05-25
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.