Engleson v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• insurer’s letter saying that if the insured had “additional information” the insurer would “be happy to reconsider [the] claim” did not waive the limitations period
• “In the event of a conflict between this Summary and the Plan documents, the applicable Plan documents (excluding this Summary Plan Description) shall govern.”
• “SPDs lack controlling effect in the face of plan language to the contrary[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).