Texas Supreme Court· 5/24/1972
Carrillo v. State
Citations
- 480 S.W.2d 612
- 15 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 340
- 1972 Tex. LEXIS 251
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “deleterious collateral effects and legal consequences” stemming from juvenile-delinquency adjudication continued to stigmatize adjudicated person even though person had served his sentence and reached age of majority and thus appeal was not moot
- holding that pleadings may be amended in juvenile delinquency proceedings
- requiring basic fairness for a juvenile- proceeding amendment to satisfy due process
- applying exception to mootness doctrine in case involving juvenile delinquency adjudication
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greenhill, Calvert, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
103 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Marshall v. Housing Authority of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court· 2006-03-03· cited 563×
- GENERAL LAND OFFICE OF THE STATE OF TEX. v. Oxy USA, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1990-05-16· cited 354×
- State v. LodgeTexas Supreme Court· 1980-11-26· cited 169×
- Hernandez v. EbromTexas Supreme Court· 2009-07-03· cited 160×
- Ex Parte GilesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-12-05· cited 138×
- In re G.A.T.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2000-03-30· cited 94×
- In the Matter of B.P.H.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2002-08-15· cited 81×
- Texas a & M University-Kingsville v. YarbroughTexas Supreme Court· 2011-08-26· cited 64×
- Loan Thi Hoang Ngo v. Son Due NgoTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-08-21· cited 59×
- R.X.F. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1996-05-01· cited 56×
- In Re CummingsTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2000-02-17· cited 53×
- Spring Branch I.S.D. v. ReynoldsTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1988-12-29· cited 51×
- In re J.G.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2006-02-01· cited 47×
- Farris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-06-11· cited 43×
- S.D.G. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1996-11-07· cited 42×
- Page v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-02-04· cited 35×
- L.G.R. v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1987-02-11· cited 35×
- Lodge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1980-02-06· cited 33×
- B. R. D. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1978-12-14· cited 33×
- P. G. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1981-03-11· cited 33×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 3,053×
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court· 1937-03-01· cited 3,033×
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,591×
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court· 1971-12-14· cited 1,338×
- Texas Foundaries, Inc. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers UnionTexas Supreme Court· 1952-04-09· cited 342×
- St. Pierre v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-05-03· cited 308×
- Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, New Jersey v. BurchTexas Supreme Court· 1968-10-09· cited 298×
- Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court· 1933-06-24· cited 287×
- United Services Life Insurance Company v. DelaneyTexas Supreme Court· 1965-12-01· cited 162×
- John Wayne Kemplen v. State of MarylandFourth Circuit· 1970-07-10· cited 117×
- Ammex Warehouse Company v. ArcherTexas Supreme Court· 1964-07-29· cited 105×
- Freeman v. BurrowsTexas Supreme Court· 1943-05-26· cited 77×
- State v. SantanaTexas Supreme Court· 1969-07-23· cited 70×
- State v. KleinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1949-10-19· cited 61×
- Santana v. TexasSupreme Court· 1970-04-27· cited 53×
- Employees Finance Company v. LathramTexas Supreme Court· 1963-07-24· cited 39×
- Lacoste v. DuffyTexas Supreme Court· 1878-07-01· cited 30×
- Poole v. GilesTexas Supreme Court· 1952-03-26· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.