Skip to main content
· 7/29/1964

Ammex Warehouse Company v. Archer

Citations

  • 381 S.W.2d 478
  • 7 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 589
  • 1964 Tex. LEXIS 702

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the state had a valid statutory right to a supersedeas without filing a bond upon perfecting its appeals from a permanent injunction
  • holding that the State had a valid statutory right to a supersedeas without filing a bond upon perfecting its appeals from a permanent injunction
  • holding that the State had a valid statutory right to a supersedeas without filing a bond upon perfecting its appeals from a permanent injunction
  • holding that appellate court could properly issue writ of prohibition to prevent trial judge’s temporary injunction order from interfering with State’s right to supersede judgment on appeal
  • holding that appellate court could properly issue writ of prohibition to prevent trial judge = s temporary injunction order from interfering with State = s right to supersede judgment on appeal
  • explaining “[t]he Court of Civil Appeals considered this temporary order to be an interference with its jurisdiction of the case which had been invoked by giving notice of appeal from the final judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hamilton, Norvell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.