· 7/29/1964
Ammex Warehouse Company v. Archer
Citations
- 381 S.W.2d 478
- 7 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 589
- 1964 Tex. LEXIS 702
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the state had a valid statutory right to a supersedeas without filing a bond upon perfecting its appeals from a permanent injunction
- holding that the State had a valid statutory right to a supersedeas without filing a bond upon perfecting its appeals from a permanent injunction
- holding that the State had a valid statutory right to a supersedeas without filing a bond upon perfecting its appeals from a permanent injunction
- holding that appellate court could properly issue writ of prohibition to prevent trial judge’s temporary injunction order from interfering with State’s right to supersede judgment on appeal
- holding that appellate court could properly issue writ of prohibition to prevent trial judge = s temporary injunction order from interfering with State = s right to supersede judgment on appeal
- explaining “[t]he Court of Civil Appeals considered this temporary order to be an interference with its jurisdiction of the case which had been invoked by giving notice of appeal from the final judgment”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hamilton, Norvell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.