Skip to main content

Carr v. State

Citations

  • 563 S.E.2d 850
  • 275 Ga. 185
  • 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 1406
  • 2002 Ga. LEXIS 379

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was not improper for the prosecutor to ask the jury to “be the voice of [the victim]”
  • assuming argu-endo that an alleged “golden rule” argument that trial counsel failed to object to was improper but concluding “that there is no reasonable probability that the erroneous comment contributed to the verdict”
  • trial court not required to make specific written findings of fact and conclusions of law when denying a motion for new trial
  • trial court not required to make specific written findings of fact and conclusions of law when denying a motion for new trial
  • “Inasmuch as appellant did not promptly interpose an objection to the prosecutor’s statements or argument or move for a mistrial, he has waived his right to complain on appeal.” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • “Inasmuch as appellant did not promptly interpose an objection to the prosecutor’s statements or argument or move for a mistrial, he has waived his right to complain on appeal.” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.