Scieszka v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant could not show prejudice from wearing a stun belt at trial where there was no evidence in the record that the belt was visible to the jury
• where no prejudice is shown, use of stun belt not abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).