Carr v. Christie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding \evidence regarding operative legal transactions\ inadmissible in absence of ambiguity
• \The parol-evidence rule operates only to exclude evidence regarding operative legal transactions and not mere statements or recitals of fact.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).