Skip to main content

Carr v. Christie

Citations

  • 970 S.W.2d 620
  • 1998 WL 153583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding \evidence regarding operative legal transactions\ inadmissible in absence of ambiguity
  • \The parol-evidence rule operates only to exclude evidence regarding operative legal transactions and not mere statements or recitals of fact.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powers, Aboussie, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.