Haase v. Glazner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute of frauds would be rendered ineffectual if a plaintiff could recover “benefit-of-the-bargain” damages under a fraud claim that could not be enforced as a contract
• stating that “with fraudulent inducement claim, the elements of fraud must be established as they relate to an agreement between the parties”
• stating that a party cannot be fraudulently induced to enter an unenforceable contract
• finding fraudulent-inducement claim could not be premised on an agreement unenforceable under the statute of frauds
• stating fraudulent inducement, by its nature, presupposes that party has been induced to enter contract; as a result, there can be no fraudulent inducement claim when there is no contract
• “with a fraudulent inducement claim, the elements of fraud must be established as they relate to an agreement between the parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).