Skip to main content
· 11/5/1952

Lindsay v. Clayman

Citations

  • 254 S.W.2d 777
  • 151 Tex. 593
  • 1952 Tex. LEXIS 444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • parol evidence rule does not operate to exclude statements which are mere recitals of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.