Carlos Quintero-Cisneros v. Jefferson Sessions

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We have held that sexual conduct involving children under the age of 14 is per se abusive.”
• “We have developed two definitions specifying the elements of the federal generic offense of sexual abuse of a minor. The first definition is not relevant for our purposes, as it applies mainly to statutory rape offenses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Larry Mero v. William Barr
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-05-01· cited 5×
• United States v. Thompson
  Ninth Circuit· 2025-02-10· cited 2×
• Leon Perez v. Garland
  Ninth Circuit· 2024-06-28· cited 1×
• Matter of KHAN
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 2024-11-01· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• Alleyne v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 5,868×
• Descamps v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2013-06-20· cited 2,997×
• Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions
  Supreme Court· 2017-05-30· cited 237×
• Estrada-Espinoza v. Mukasey
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-10-20· cited 213×
• United States v. Medina-Villa
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-05-28· cited 146×
• State v. Recuenco
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-04-17· cited 99×
• State v. Siers
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-04-19· cited 74×
• Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-12-14· cited 61×
• Juan Hernandez-Gonzalez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
  Ninth Circuit· 2015-02-13· cited 12×
• United States v. Doroteo Rocha-Alvarado
  Ninth Circuit· 2016-12-12· cited 9×