Supreme Court· 5/30/2017
Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions
Citations
- 581 U.S. 385
- 137 S. Ct. 1562
- 198 L. Ed. 2d 22
- 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3551
- 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 607
- 85 U.S.L.W. 4296
- 2017 WL 2322840
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that courts may “look to state criminal codes for 8 additional evidence about the generic meaning of sexual abuse of a minor”
- collecting state criminal 8 codes in assessing the generic age of consent
- “[T]he generic federal definition of sexual abuse of a minor requires that the victim be younger than 16.”
- “We have no need to resolve whether the rule of lenity or Chevron receives priority in this case because the statute, read in context, unambiguously forecloses the Board's interpretation. Therefore, neither the rule of lenity nor Chevron applies.”
- “We begin, as always, with the text.”
- “We begin, as always, with the text.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clarence Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.