Juan Hernandez-Gonzalez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a State statute does not categorically define a crime involving moral turpitude if there is a “realistic probability” that the elements of that statute would be applied “to conduct that falls beyond the scope of the generic federal offense”
• refusing to defer to Matter of Hernandez and calling its reasoning into doubt
• rejecting BIA conclusion regarding “moral turpitude” even while applying Chevron deference
• rejecting BIA conclusion regarding “moral turpitude” even while applying Chevron deference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).