Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 6/7/1972

Carleson v. Remillard

Citations

  • 406 U.S. 598
  • 92 S. Ct. 1932
  • 32 L. Ed. 2d 352
  • 1972 U.S. LEXIS 141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a California regulation that conflicted with the Social Security Act invalid under the Supremacy Clause
  • stating that § 602(a)(10) \places on each State participating in the AFDC program the requirement that `aid to families with dependent children shall be furnished with reasonable promptness to all eligible individuals' \
  • invalidating a state law preventing children whose fathers were serving in the military from receiving AFDC benefits because Congress did not intend to exclude a class of benefit recipients
  • stating ________ that 602(a)(10) \places on each State participating in the AFDC __ _____ program the requirement that 'aid to families with dependent children shall be furnished with reasonable promptness to all eligible individuals\
  • denial of benefits to child when father's absence was due to military service held to be in conflict with provision as to \continued absence from the home\ in § 606(a)
  • denial of benefits to child when father’s absence was due to military service held to be in conflict with provision as to “continued absence from the home” in § 606(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Burger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

159 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Carleson v. Remillard

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.