Miller v. Youakim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the phrase “also include” was “language that unquestionably expand[ed] the scope” of the defined term
• holding that Illinois’ policy of denying foster care payments to children who received basic AFDC payments while placed with relatives violated Congressional intent
• stating that the foster care system involves “issues of legislative policy [that] are better addressed to the wisdom of [the legislature] than to the judgment of this Court” (alterations omitted) (quotation marks omitted)
• administrative interpretations are especially persuasive where, as here, the agency participated in developing the provision
• although supremacy clause claim was not presented to or addressed by district court, such question could have been pursued under complaint; therefore judgmént was vacated and ease remanded to allow opportunity to air claim
• although supremacy clause claim was not presented to or addressed by district court, such question could have been pursued under complaint; therefore judgment was vacated and case remanded to allow opportunity to air claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).