Supreme Court· 6/6/1978

Quern v. Mandley

Citations

436 U.S. 725
98 S. Ct. 2068
56 L. Ed. 2d 658
1978 U.S. LEXIS 101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that discriminatory views of one member of five-member village council cannot be imputed to the entire council
recognizing the \well-established principle that the States have 'undisputed power to set the level of benefits and the standard of need' for their AFDC programs\ (quoting King v. Smith, 392 U.S. at 334)
finding no procedural error in an appeals court’s direction of an entry of judgment enjoining a state’s operation of a program that the state had discontinued long before
portions of 42 U.S.C. § 602 which only apply to AFDC indicated by a specific reference
deference given to interpretation of statute by agencies charged with its execution
state emergency assistance program consistent with SSA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackmun, Members, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

139 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Quern v. Mandley

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.